San Francisco Project & Delivery: Stakeholder Management, JIRA, Project Management Lead 591 Roles -- January 2026
BetaSan Francisco's Project and Delivery market in January 2026 tracked 591 roles across 340 employers, with a 14:1 senior-to-junior ratio making entry highly competitive. Mobility-sector employers led hiring among tracked companies, and the overall median salary sat at $154,500.
This report analyzes 591 Project & Delivery job postings from 340+ companies tracked via direct employer career pages and job board aggregators. Our coverage skews toward tech-forward and scaling companies; large enterprises using enterprise hiring platforms may be underrepresented. Coverage varies by section and is noted throughout.
Key Takeaways for Job Seekers
Skills Demand
42% of roles with skills data
Skills insight: Among 42% of tracked roles with skills data (249 roles), stakeholder management (25%) and JIRA (21%) are the most requested capabilities, followed by project management (19%), Agile (18%), and risk management (18%). The top skill pairs, Agile + JIRA (10%) and Risk management + Stakeholder management (10%), suggest employers value candidates who combine process methodology with tooling proficiency. Emerging skills include AI (6%) and SQL (7%), which may indicate a growing expectation that delivery professionals can engage with data-driven decision-making and AI-assisted workflows.
Seniority Distribution
Junior: 0-2 years | Mid-Level: 3-5 years | Senior: 6-10 years | Staff/Principal: 11+ years (IC track) | Director+: Management track
Senior-to-Junior Ratio
14:1
Senior+ roles per Junior role
Entry Accessibility Rate
22%
Junior + Mid-Level roles combined
Senior roles dominate at 54%, followed by Director+ and Mid-Level tied at 16% each, Staff/Principal at 7%, and Junior at 6%. The 14:1 senior-to-junior ratio makes this one of the most competitive entry-level delivery markets tracked. The 22% entry accessibility rate is the lowest across tracked cities, indicating that most delivery openings in San Francisco target experienced professionals.
Working Arrangement
Onsite: office full-time | Hybrid: mix of office and remote | Remote: work from anywhere | Flexible: employee chooses arrangement
97% of roles with known working arrangement
Among 97% of tracked roles with working arrangement data (based on 126 ATS-sourced roles), Remote leads at 40%, followed by Hybrid (27%), Flexible (26%), and Onsite (7%). The high remote share may reflect delivery roles' inherent suitability for distributed work, as coordination and stakeholder management can often be performed effectively across locations. Only 7% of roles required full onsite presence.
Role Specialization
Programme manager (49%) and project manager (41%) together account for 90% of tracked delivery roles. Delivery manager holds 10% while scrum master is marginal at 1%. Based on a single month's movement, project manager gained 7 percentage points and programme manager declined by 6 points, which could be driven by seasonal variation in how employers title similar coordination roles rather than a structural shift.
IC vs Management Track
Individual contributor roles account for 83% of tracked postings, with management at 17%. This split is consistent with delivery functions where most programme and project managers operate as ICs coordinating across teams rather than managing direct reports. The 17% management share may appeal to candidates seeking people-leadership paths within the delivery discipline.
Compensation
13% of roles with disclosed salary ranges
Overall Distribution
25th Percentile
$120K
Median
$155K
75th Percentile
$185K
IQR (Spread)
$65K
Advertised Salary by Seniority
Advertised Salary by Role
Market Context
Methodology
This report analyzes direct employer job postings for Project & Delivery roles in San Francisco during January 2026.
Data collection:
- 1.Over 500 roles from 340+ employers aggregated from multiple sources
- 2.Recruitment agency postings identified and excluded (7% of raw data)
- 3.Jobs deduplicated across sources to avoid double-counting
Classification:
- 1.Roles classified using an LLM-powered taxonomy
- 2.Subfamily, seniority, skills, and working arrangement extracted
- 3.Employer metadata enriched from company databases where available
Limitations:
- 1.Not a complete census of the market - some roles may not be captured
- 2.Skills analysis based on 249 roles with skill data (42% coverage)
- 3.Salary data available due to pay transparency law
- 4.Working arrangement based on 126 ATS-sourced roles (Adzuna excluded due to truncated descriptions)
Data coverage:
68%
Seniority coverage
Roles with seniority level classified
97%
Arrangement coverage
Roles with working arrangement known
42%
Skills coverage
Roles with skills extracted from description
62%
Employer metadata
Roles with enriched company data
Want interactive dashboards and the full dataset?
Sign up for free to access the dashboard, job feed, and detailed reports.